Built for the regulator you actually answer to.
DORA rebuilt financial-sector cyber regulation around five pillars — governance, ICT risk management, incident management and reporting, resilience testing, and third-party risk — and financial entities answer for all of them, often alongside NIS2 and ISO 27001. The obligations overlap heavily. The evidence shouldn't multiply with each one.
TruSecure maps DORA's pillars onto one shared control model with your other regimes: one control over privileged access satisfies DORA's ICT risk management, NIS2's measures, ISO's Annex A — and every other regime that asks for it — one evidence trail, every citation it earns.
What changes for the entity
- Establish the registers
The ICT third-party register and the asset base are structured once, mapped to controls from the start — not rebuilt per pillar.
- Run the clocks
Major ICT incidents follow DORA's reporting flow — initial, intermediate, final — with every classification and decision recorded inside the clock.
- Evidence the framework
The ICT risk framework is documented as operating controls with continuous evidence, not as a policy PDF that asserts one.
- Prove the testing
Resilience-testing results land as records linked to the controls they exercised — findings, remediation and re-test in one trail.
What you'd actually look at
One entry from the ICT third-party register — the detail behind every row in the register view:
- Function
- critical · Art. 28
- Exit plan
- documented · tested Q2
- Monitors
- sub-processors · incidents
- Citations
- DORA Art. 28 · NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d)
- Changes
- 1 sub-processor flagged
The five pillars, operationalized
| Pillar | Citation | Where it operates |
|---|---|---|
| Governance and organization | Art. 5 | Board reporting |
| ICT risk management framework | Art. 6 · 8 · 9 | Risk register · controls |
| Incident management and reporting | Art. 17 · 19 | Incident resilience |
| Resilience testing | Art. 10 | Testing evidence |
| ICT third-party risk | Art. 28 · 30 | Supplier register |
The second line's view
Financial-sector governance runs through a second line — risk and compliance functions that must see both the regulatory mapping and the operational state. In TruSecure that is one view: the pillar mapping above, the underlying controls, the exceptions open against them and the evidence behind each — readable without a data request, and exportable scoped, timestamped and sealed when a supervisor or internal audit asks.
How financial entities usually start
A demo with our regulatory specialists against your frameworks and stack, then onboarding that maps DORA to operating controls — registers, clocks and testing included — then the subscription. No self-serve checkout, no per-seat math.
TruSecure helps operationalize requirements and prepare evidence. Legal interpretation should be validated by qualified counsel.